Successful instructional leadership styles in education. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Pdf the effects of autocratic and democratic leadership styles. The autocratic style of leadership is also known as authoritative style or directive style of leadership, in which the autocratic leader retains most of the authority for himselfherself. This type of head teacher decides everything and tries to manipulate the teachers into approving his ideas on how the school should function. However, one of the foremost thinkers of leadership and leadership development, john adair. More members exited their group under an autocratic style leader, relative to a democratic style leader, regardless of whether or not they received favorable personal outcomes from the leader.
It works well when trying to solve a complex concern. List of the advantages of the autocratic leadership style 1. Leadership is the ability to move a group towards a common goal that would not be. Mar 15, 2018 here are the biggest advantages and disadvantages of a democratic leadership style to think about. Democratic leadership aiding the groups decisionmaking process autocratic leadership make decisions with little or no input from others.
Autocratic leaders make choices or decisions based on their own beliefs and do not involve others for their suggestion or advice. The team cannot put forward their views even if they are best for the teams or organizational interests. Leadership styles autocratic democratic laissezfaire leadership styles like autocratic, democratic, and laissezfaire styles in page 426. Autocratic regimes may be replaced by either new autocratic regimes or democratic regimes, but previous research has only looked at changes between democratic and non democratic regimes where nondemocracy is a residual category that lumps together both stable autocratic regimes and transitions between autocratic regimes. There are several types of leadership styles such as transformational leadership, transactional leadership, autocratic, democratic leadership. Leadership is a social influence process in which the leader. Autocratic, democratic and laissezfaire leadership styles. His results showed that the democratic style of leadership is superior to the other two styles. The purpose of this investigation was to isolate personality correlates of leadership by determining the unique personality profiles associated with autocratic and democratic leadership styles. Hence, autocratic leadership is not a stable longterm solution to the problem of public goods in groups.
Researchers of this study categorized leadership styles into three main styles of leadership, which helped to organize the observations into more simplified data. A limited number of practical and moral considerations are identified for assessing the appropriateness of the democratic leadership model for different groups. View autocratic leadership ppts online, safely and virusfree. List of books and articles about leadership styles and theory. The relationship between mcgregors xy theory management. In addition, the national issues forums program is used to illustrate the model, and suggestions are made for future research on democratic leadership. Compare democratic and autocratic leadership essay sample. A definition and illustration of democratic leadership.
Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. Click here to download leadership lessons from hubspot founder, dharmesh. Autocratic leadership is the inverse of democratic leadership. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Notably, young athletes strongly preferred training and instruction, followed by positive feedback, democratic behavior, social support, and autocratic behavior. For this purpose a questionnaire was developed and. Model for leadership style evaluation 159 they might use a prescriptive, autocratic style of leadership. The effects of autocratic and democratic leadership styles on employees. Compare and contrast autocratic and democratic leadership. A study of the afghan wireless communication company, afghanistan by. An autocratic leader defines his goals and facilitates group movement toward them. One of the management principles that is always put to use by an autocratic leader is control. Unfortunately, in smaller businesses, the autocratic leadership style is much more frequent than the democratic one.
Thus the purpose of the study is to explore the intriguing question of the most pragmatic leadership style and its potential impact on employees motivation. Leadership style includes autocratic leadership style, democratic leadership style and free rein leadership style. The lessons of exemplary models for democratic governance sanghan choi florida atlantic university since leadership plays a vital role in democratic movements, understanding the nature of democratic leadership is essential. Leadership styles business studies xii reference notes. In autocratic leadership style, leaders have full authority over others in making decisions. An autocratic leader gives orders to hisher subordinates and expects that subordinates should give complete obedience to the. Sep 26, 2016 while being genuine is an essential part of leadership, you must learn to adapt your leadership style as the business environment, team members and goals change around you. Most leadership gurus have discrepancies in their definition and none seem to share the same view about its actual meaning. Leadership preferences of adolescent players in sport.
Therefore, we concluded that creativity was an important construct, necessary to conduct research in this field, considering that the diversity of ideas, if properly analyzed, can have a major positive impact on the. Thus, participation is the major characteristic of democratic leadership bass, 1990. Feb 24, 2017 autocratic leadership is more efficient to tackle intra organizational conflicts including the distribution of scarce resources. Pdf the impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on. Personality determinants of autocratic and democratic leadership. Leadership varies in definition due to its complexity and diverse contexts ranging from business to politics and organization. This article develops an integrated perspective on key aspects of leadership succession at the level of political chief executives in democracies and autocracies. The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style. Pdf this current research investigates the impact of autocratic and. Since the effectiveness of a leader is a major determinant of success or failure of an. Gender had no effect on expressing leadership styles and creativity. In a study conducted by okoroji, anyanwu, and ukpere 2014, a democratic leadership style was found to be the most effective style because student. The autocratic leadership style does not instill learning mentality which is.
Autocratic leadership is a management style wherein one person controls all the decisions and takes very little inputs from other group members. Before proceeding to the comparison and contrast, it is necessary to firstly explain the autocratic and the democratic leadership styles. Autocratic or leadercentered style of leadership is one in which the leader has all the power to make decisions. The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction. A comparative assessment across time and space reveals several features that challenge established notions, and stereotypes, of leadership succession in democratic and autocratic regimes. Benefits and disadvantages if you have been recently promoted into a leadership role or you have seen your team work less efficiently in recent months, then you may need to learn more about the leadership styles that are most effective in running a company. Autocratic leadership is a classical leadership style with the following characteristics. Chemers 1984 also defined democratic leadership as emphasizing group participation. At one time, the study of autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers was one of the most researched topics in the social sciences meloen, 1993, but interest has fallen off, leaving some researchers to speculate as to the causes of this decline even as they continue to argue that such research is now more important than ever cohrs, 20, ludeke, 2016. Ttest shows that the teaching style of a course teacher is mainly autocratic, while democratic and laissezfaire styles are more present in the teaching of class teachers. Autocratic democratic leadership style questionnaire find a book you want to read, you can select the format you prefer to download from a drop down menu of dozens of different file formats.
The impact of participative leadership on employees motivation, job satisfaction and innovation abstract in todays complex and changing environment leadership is a highly valued commodity. A metaanalytic integration of research evidence addressing this paradox revealed that there was, in general, a significant, small tendency for groups experiencing democratic leadership to be more satisfied than groups experiencing autocratic leadership. The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job. That means all creative decisions originate from the leader. Tilburg university why autocratic leadership might fail in. Power division, followers motivation and decision quality in both styles are compared in the following essay. For this purpose, autocratic, democratic, and laissezfaire styles are considered as independent variables, while. Downsides of democratic leadership while democratic leadership has been described as the most effective leadership style, it does have some potential downsides. A basic introduction kindle edition by bevoc, louis. Motivation the democratic leadership style gave the highest level motivation from children and their work continued even when the teacher left the room, in contrast, work from the children ceased altogether under the autocratic leadership style. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages to consider with the autocratic leadership style. Download it once and read it on your kindle device, pc, phones or tablets. Autocratic, democratic, leadership, job satisfaction.
There are number of recognized versions, or styles, of leadership, some of which have been shown to be more effective than others. The study was conducted to investigate the impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction with a sample of 205 teachers both male and female of public and private schools. Autocratic and democratic leadership styles are often talked about in a political context, however they manifest themselves in everyday life as well. Autocratic leadership is an exchange process, so it is a matter of contingent reinforcement of. The relationship between leadership styles autocratic and. Autocratic and democratic leadership styles are often talked about in a political context, however they manifest themselves in everyday. The major findings revealed that democratic leadership style is the most practiced leadership style in women. Pdf the impact of autocratic and democratic leadership. Actually, three different leadership styles identified by kurt lewin, a renowned social scientist, in 1939, were. This current research investigates the impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction in private and public school. Leadership styles and theory leadership is the process of motivating a group of people to act towards accomplishing a common task. In situations where roles are unclear or time is of the essence, democratic. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers.
This morning i am going to introduce you to 2 styles of leadership management,so that by the end of the session you will be able to. However, the definition of democratic leadership is unclear gastil, 1994. The autocratic style provides fast crisis management benefits. This area of study is suggested for future research. According to them an autocratic leader is a leader who is highhanded in his administration. A conceptual model is developed on the basis of their relationship with a view to analyze which one leadership style is most appropriate to improve the performance of employees of an organization. Theory x, theory y, management style, psychological contract, psychological contract fulfillment. They do not respond to their needs or problems or seek to gain their opinion. Although this form of leadership is often found within the government, it is also present in some corporate structures as well. The data was collected through questionnaire and the collected data was analyzed through computer software spss version. The effects of democratic leadership on group member. Leaders know how to solve problems, but they may not be able to solve all problems.
Here are the key advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership to consider. Obedience, loyalty and complete adherence to the rules are expected. Lewins study found that participative leadership, also known as democratic. Other managers believe that they should be sensitive and responsive to the needs of their employees and apply a more democratic style of leadership koontz, 1993. Based on this premise, the present study aims to explore the relationship between leadership style and organizational performance. The impact of participative leadership on employees. The data in the study were collected from 395 primary school teachers 165 male and 230 female in central districts of mersin, turkey. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading autocratic leadership. In this lesson, well look at autocratic teaching strategies, including what they are, their pros and cons, and how they impact.
Influence of autocratic leadership style on the job. On the other extreme, the democratic leadership is one that gives the subordinates equal chance of participating in the decisionmaking process as to what is to be done and how it is to be done. When the authority and decisionmaking power are concentrated on the leader is known as autocratic leadership style. The relationship between mcgregors xy theory management style and fulfillment of psychological. Department of industrial engineering and management, jss academy of technical education, bangalore, india nswamy. He is a centre of all the activities that go on in the establishment where he is a leader.
Pdf the effects of autocratic and democratic leadership. How can the way that teachers teach influence classroom management. By comparing your scores, you can determine which styles are most dominant and least dominant in your own style of leadership. Pdf the paper aims at detecting relations between participative management and rewarding strategies as well as. In this style of leadership, a leader has complete command and hold over their employeesteam. A definition and illustration of democratic leadership john gastill2 renewed calls for demaracy make it imperative that we understand the nature of democratic lcadcrship. Autocratic leadership is the coercive type of leadership in which power concentrates in the hand of one person or a group of individual. Leadership styles autocratic, laissez faire, participative. Check out the article presented to you, which explains the difference between autocratic and democratic leadership.
Instead of there being a democratic process for teams, there are no group positions of leadership with the autocratic style. Difference between autocratic and democratic leadership. Leadership styles and theory questia online library. Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited. Autocratic leadership style beta coefficient value is 0. He is supreme in delegating duties to his subordinates which they are obligated to complete. For this purpose, autocratic, democratic, and laissezfaire styles are considered as independent variables, while employees motivation is the dependent variable. Existing definitions of dcmwrstic lcadcrship are inconsistent and inadequate, so this essay provides s clear delinilion that applies lo social groups both large and small.
517 932 1418 1007 1085 479 732 1510 1253 125 814 570 1430 282 1385 228 64 841 331 1368 597 685 1472 1434 961 730 311 1395 363 1522 1227 1253 920 864 759 336 548 1107 1427 831 144 1439 982 1291